Wednesday, 3 December 2014

International Day of Persons with Disabilities 2014

I have been so ill this year and particularly bad this past couple of months that I have missed so much. Fate must have been conspiring behind my back, for this morning I awoke refreshed from ten hours of uninterrupted slumber (did not even hear the alarm which was supposed to remind me to turn in bed to prevent bed-sores) with energy and to the most glorious wintry morning. I even went downstairs this morning to greet lovely carer #2 to her pleasant surprise. I actually have a smile on my face. Hang on need another coffee from the Senseo® machine… These drink-making machines are great, creating one cup of a delicious and warming hot beverage whenever I need. Due to inter alia my arthritis and being bed-ridden, I used to have to go without hot drinks for the most part unless someone visited.

Right, back… [slurp] Mmmmmmmm - lovely!



So, to the point in hand: today is International Day of Persons with Disabilities (on Twitter one of today's main hashtags is #IDPD2014). Per UN Enable (screen-shot above) this year's theme is "Sustainable Development: The Promise of Technology". Well, however important that may be from a global, even individual perspective, it certainly is not inspiring me and I do not have the energy, resolve nor cognitive ability to delve into the subject to research it and write a blog-post today.

Instead, I have decided to update on my previous contributions and share just some of the disability issues that have come to my attention over the past couple of days via wifi to my laptop.

In 2012 I published Who represents disabled folk? As it happens Disability Rights UK, one of the UK government's preferred agencies, sent me the following via facebook:




I not only shared, but responded:


Hope he's going to mention political polemic,
MSM slurs/slander/misrepresentation,
and the failure of many charities to step up to the plate!


At the time of writing, no response from DRUK. It's amazing isn't it: just how quickly organisations can fail to respond. What did we do before social media?

DRUK have issued a reasonably balanced, between highlights and low-lights, overview statement on the state of disabled folks' rights in the UK. The following is particularly galling given that the United Kingdom is a full signatory to UNCRPD:

More disabled people are going into institutions than coming out, despite government promises; and the number of people being forcibly treated or detained against their will has gone up year on year. These are major human rights abuses.

In 2013, I pointed the finger at the Office for Disability Issues (ODI) a subsidiary of the much-detested and infamous Department of Work & Pensions (DWP). Interestingly the ODI no longer has a separate website but has been subsumed into a page on gov.uk. Yet again, today is totally ignored; the most up-to-date article is from 4th September 2014 (see screen-shot below).




What does that say about how valued disabled folk are in the United Kingdom? What does it say about the UK ConDem co-alition's attitude towards both us and the United Nations?

Hang on! Pill box is just reminding me I need to take some medication…

As many readers will know, one of my debilitating conditions is myalgic encephalomyelitis (ICD-10 G93.3 - thank the maker for Wikipedia!).

With this in mind, one can comprehend how excited I was to note that one of the first items on my Facebook news-feed this morning was the International Business Times' article to commemorate International Day of Persons with Disabilities: the debilitating truth about chronic fatigue syndrome (see screen-shot below).



I felt like this morning was Christmas Day as M.E. aka C.F.S. rarely gets such coverage. As the spokesperson from the M.E.Association says:

There are no psychological quick fixes for serious, classic ME, but there is mounting evidence that it is caused by a barrage of neurological, immunological and endocrinological assaults on the body.

And incidentally, whilst I have been writing this article, I have just had an email from my G.P. discussing my health-care, what actions we might take and she also arranged for a prescription to be sent through to my pharmacist, who will deliver my meds later. Before e-health I could wait days to hear back from the medical practice replying to slow-mail (aka letters) and then I would have to wait even longer for my prescription drugs to be collected.

Oh, also just now had an email from the agency which supplies my carers discussing arrangements for the rest of the week. Both they and I now have more flexibility in if-when-and-how matters as they can be quickly resolved.

And finally, a couple of matters on transport - in its broadest sense. I received an email (see screen-shot below) this morning from the Papworth Trust asking me to complete a survey on train-travel.



I was more than happy to do so, as I have had some awful experiences. However, I must express my gratitude by stating that the support team at Euston Station in London have always been absolutely fantastic - never once a problem - which is more than can be said for support at Piccadilly Station in Manchester, I am ashamed to reveal.

If you have a spare five minutes, please consider completing the survey. Cheers! %)

Transport for All, is based in London. I am not. However, I believe that what London gets will eventually be shared with the rest of the country. A week or so ago, a friend in Spain made me aware of a video of an invention that could improve the lives of disabled folk, parents with push-chairs, travellers with luggage and so on: an adaptation to escalators.



I shared this with TfA, and they are as excited about it as I am and so have shared it themselves. Thus spreading the word and apprising many more folk of this wonderful idea.

Well, that's it for my review of disability issues which entered my æther in the past twenty-four hours.

Who would want to discuss the oh-so-dull topic of technology? ;)


Monday, 1 December 2014

Gay Wheelies Win!!!

Readers may recall my first ever guest blog-post by LGBT Network's Rob McDowall on a case of discrimination on the Glasgow gay scene, whence a queer couple, both of whom were in a wheelchair, were denied entry to a night-club despite having been permitted entry on previous occasions. You can read the full article here.

Well, I am delighted to have found out and pass on the good news that the lads won their case of disability discrimination. Here is the link to the news.

"a hearing at Glasgow Sheriff Court ruled the couple had been discriminated against and they will receive £2000 in compensation after G1's legal representatives agreed to the decree.
It is one of the only civil cases seen in Scotland under the Equality Act in relation to access for disabled people."



The part I find exciting, from a very personal perspective, as I am also queer & disabled, is, in the words of one of the partners, Robert Gale:
"We took this case for that young LGBT disabled person whose first experience of trying to access their so called community is to be told that they're not wanted."
"We took this case to show every company who thinks it can get away with treating disabled people like they are unworthy of using their services that they can't."
I am so thrilled at this outcome. Well done the both of them! %D

Thursday, 27 November 2014

Favourite Games

I am still in the process of moving out of Facebook. Probably going to take me another couple of years at the rate I am going. All games have, however, now been deleted therefrom.

Anyway, herewith is my list of favourite games, with links (mainly from Wikipedia) where available. Due to my various disabilities these days I can only play games using a computer keyboard; these are denoted with an asterisk (*).

Looking back at the list has prompted memories of those who played with me as I grew from childhood to young adult. Happy times! %D


Active games

kick-stone - a form of hide-and-seek where the players have to kick a specific stone to get themselves out of the running. If the person who is 'on' kicks the stone before them, then the person is in the running for being 'on' next game.


Board-type games


[Image description: game of mah-jong in play from apple store]

Monopoly ® Hasbro
noughts and crosses (tic-tac-toe)
Trivial Pursuit ® Hasbro


Card games

chase the ace (aka Old Maid)
German whist (aka Honeymoon whist)
*patience (solitaire)


Mind puzzles


[Image description: game of sudoku in play from apple store]




Sex games


doctors and nurses



Hopefully one or other of the games on my list will have made it on to your list. If not, feel at liberty to add a comment about your favourite game below.


Saturday, 8 November 2014

To Keep Or Not To Keep…



Yesterday, JuliJuxtaposed published the following blog-post here. She quite succinctly sums up what many disabled folk have been and are thinking about Ed Miliband and the Labour party. Please read it and share widely, as we need our disablie voices heard loud and clear.


After the blog, appear my comments.



[Image description: Ed Miliband addressing Mancunians in 2012]


*******

Not just Ed. Maybe not Ed, at all.



To Labour,
Taking into account the Media’s efforts to paint Ed as a disaster and halving it – and halving it again – the fallout around poor old Miliband is still not fuelling confidence in me that he can hold it together, even if he wins the next General Election. What kind of Cabinet will his ‘team’ make? Who will be served by it? And how much is Ed Miliband the real problem? Is his perceived weakness due more to his ‘awkwardness’ – by now a self-perpetuating force – or to his inability to discern and avail himself of useful, appropriate advice? Most of his team, whether front or back benchers or hired consultants are hardly helpful or even inspiring. He surrounds himself with the dismal advice and strategies of banality, nostalgic muddle-heads and should-be Conservatives. Did he actually choose this team? How much of it is chosen for him? Is the weakness not in his judgement, then?
The party bigwigs should make their minds up about how their individual, personal philosophies fit to the mission statement. The ‘crisis’ in the party is that, like the Conservatives, Labour doesn’t know itself anymore; like the Conservatives, Labour has become two parties in denial. Like the Conservatives, Labour doesn’t identify sufficiently with the real worlds of its electorate. So, by all means, get rid of Ed, if you think it’ll help but, for goodness’ sake: don’t stop there! Wake up and lose the stale and mouldy obstacles. Not just Ed. Maybe not Ed, at all. Are you sure you’re not worrying a little too much about the wrong Ed? Get rid of the Blair acolytes and apologists; get rid of the Brownonian bulldozers. Shift them all to the back benches or suggest they join another party if they’re so keen on being a politician but tell them that their ideas of what Labour means have turned out to be an historically nasty, neoliberal blip and that they are not at all the desired trajectory.
The social, political, economic circumstances in which this country (and indeed, the world) finds herself are too grave to waste time on loyalty for loyalty’s sake. Be loyal out of respect and faith or walk away. Keep Ed, or don’t. Put up or shut up. Shit, or get off the pot. Just make your minds up and sort it out already! Change your rules or overrule him if that’s what you want and that’s what it takes. But is it entirely Ed Miliband or is it mostly the scaffolding?
The Conservatives will kill us if they win in 2015. You know it. And you know why. Stop imitating them. Stop pandering to the right-wing press. Stop pretending you know what we want just because you wandered around in public the other day, surrounded by cameras, looking for a photo-op and a soundbite. Stop seeing us through your own projections and try actually listening beyond received clichés. Try speaking to us in more than soundbites and clichés. Be brave, get a grip and give this country or however many countries we are, these days, a credible box on the ballot. One that will be my pleasure to mark my cross in.
Whatever you do, it’s going to be a risk. Lose because of him. Win in spite of him. Win because you dared to change the guards and the message. Lose because you replaced him too late with the effect of greater farce. You have to choose which one you can live with so that I can choose.
Please… Choose integrity. Choose authenticity. Choose to have courage in your convictions. Choose. Hurry up and choose.

© JuliJuxtaposed
******


I have met Miliband: I find him to be a very thoughtful, intelligent and caring person; I also believe he does listen to those to whom he actually speaks. Alas, as you have so well encapsulated, Labour is not their leader.

Nonetheless, whilst I respect Ed, a good leader would have gone out of his way to castigate the bigwigs who shifted the disabled folk at the last party conference and would have personally apologised to the individuals concerned.

A few months back, I was invited to his key-note NHS speech in Manchester (blog-post). Those of us in wheelchairs were in a no-man's land at the back where he could not possibly see us, let alone interact with us. Again, not his fault, but that of Labour organisers & bigwigs. We disablies are an after-thought if we are even considered at all (we were not at a previous event of his & MEN in 2012 - blog-post).

Saturday, 1 November 2014

Toxic Individuals; Toxic Affinities


[Image description: a photo of sky above mountain peaks,
upon which the following text is overwritten -

You don't ever have to feel guilty about
REMOVING TOXIC PEOPLE
FROM YOUR LIFE.
It doesn't matter whether someone is a relative,
romantic interest, employer, childhood friend,
or a new acquaintance - you don't have to make
room for people who cause you pain or make
you feel small. It's one thing if a person owns up
to their behaviour and makes an effort to change.
But if a person disregards your feelings, ignores
your boundaries, and "continues" to treat you
in a harmful way, they need to go.

- DANIEL KOEPKE

© Simple Reminders

*

I have separated myself from very toxic parents. This was done on the advice of my G.P. (family doctor), psychologist and psychiatrist more than a decade ago. My mental health has never been better and I can genuinely say I am now a content and happy person. My previous (the afore referenced) G.P. noted within a matter of months the amelioration in my confidence levels, previously never experienced by myself. I can never wholly clear out their toxic legacy; but I have done my level best.

A couple of years back, a friendship that was adversely affecting my amour-propre was brought to an end by myself after discussing with the chap and finding no way to improve matters.

One of my cousins, whom I love dearly, is extremely negative, so I try to avoid as much as possible, especially when feeling low myself. But I should never wish to cut the person off completely, as there is much good in them.

Knowing that specific folk are toxic to one's health, is the first step in preventing them from causing one harm. It is never an easy step and one ought to fully consider all the ramifications before ending any relationship. However, I personally can vouch for the benefits of ending toxic affinities.

%)